Hello viewers

Welcome to our SAP FICO Q&A Blog

This blog is meant to be a forum for SAP FICO Professionals all over the world to share knowledge and experience, as well as to provide timely suggestions and solutions for the work related issues.

Please provide your valuable suggestions to improve this Blog.

Website counter

Search This Blog for SAP Solutions

Monday, May 19, 2014

From Neelima, UK

Dear Sir,

We pay Bought Ledger Invoices and Subcontractor Payments in respect of our various projects. These are generally costed to both a GL Account Code and also a WBS Code
typically Invoices are coded to one GL & Subcontactor costs to an other
1. In the course of constructing a new building part of the work may need a new technique or process. Eg in the course of building (say) a hospital, the wall alongside the X-RAY room may be constructed in a totally new way to screen the Radiation from reaching to room next door.
The normal business of construction continues, the building is constructed, suppliers & subcontactors are paid for the work done.
However, at the end of the year, when we are calculating the company tax payable to the government, we can claim a tax reduction based on the value of “ R&D – Research and Development – costs” in the year.
Obviously only a relatively small percentage of the invoices/subcontractor certificates processed in a year can be correctly classified as “R&D Relevant”.
While in a few cases we may be able to identify a particular suppliers invoice is “R&D relevant” prior to processing in SAP and coding it in an additional special way
Eg GL Acct 62000n + normal business required WBS code & similarly Subcontractors to
GL Acct 65000n + normal business required WBS code.
(set on the ME21N order for certificate posting information).
It is highly unlikely that all such invoices or subcontractor orders could have their “R&D relevant” status correctly assessed prior to invoice / subcontract certificate SAP FI / CO posting.
a) There are likely to be many invoice / subcontractor certificate postings that need subsequent “identification” “R&D relevant”.
b) It is inevitable that were some items (invoice / subcontractor certificate) identified as “R&D relevant” & coded in some way prior to posting (as 2 above), a subsequent review would identify such items as “finally NOT R&D relevant”.
c) Only a small minority of invoices/subcontractor items processed would be “R&D Relevant”, it would be impractical to attempt to “note / mark up” all non

2. REQUIREMENT
We need the means to be able to retrospectively note particular invoice / subcontractor items costed to Projects as “R&D relevant” or “Not R&D relevant”.
We should be able – on re-review – revise the classification.
we need to be able to list/report on the invoices/subcontractor items costed to a project – for a particular time period subtotalled by classification “R&D relevant” or “Not R&D relevant” or not classified (deemed to be Not R&D relevant).
Can you please advice the best way to meet this requirement in SAP.

Initial thoughts are to use long text field . But can an internal order with out having to settle but just as a memorandom or a flag is possible?
Your assistance is greately appreciated.
Many thanks,
Neelima.